TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: scanners
to: TOM WALKER
from: DUANE VINCENT
date: 1998-03-20 20:59:00
subject: Phone patch

I'd like to add my two cents... The best reason for not having phone
patches on trunked systems is that a phone call usually lasts far longer
than a radio transmission.  There are a finite number of frequencies in
the particular public safety system, and the inordinate length of a
phone call takes 1/x of the system away from general use.
I am factory trained on Ericsson trunked systems, and had a major hand
in one for a year.  The decision was not lightly made to not allow phone
patches.  
Generally, a transmitter site will have 5-8 frequencies, with some major
cities running up to 25 or so frequencies.  Let us say that the
particular site running the phone patch has 5 frequencies - suitable for
a smaller community or area.  One frequency is designated as the control
channel, and continuously transmits.  We are left with 4 working
frequencies.  Allow a phone patch on one, and you have cut the available
working frequencies by 25 percent.  With good trunked systems running in
the millions (yes, I said millions!) of dollars, you can see why eating
the cellular bill is understandable.
Duane
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------
* Origin: Memory Alpha - (253) 859-6200 (1:343/311)

SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.