O>ML>camaro, and possibly pay for it later. the extra bucks up front for the
NO>ML>accura will pay off in the long run in the form of repairs, etc.
NO>It occurs to me that you may want to check maintainance costs of these
NO>cars (esp. the acura) before you make this assertion. The camaro will
NO>almost certainly require more unscheduled repairs, but many of them will
NO>be inexpensive the acura will require much more intensive maintainance
NO>to keep it alive (timing belts alone add up over 200k miles) and acura
NO>parts costs are significantly higher than chevy's.
NO>---
NO>Sent via MailLink, 13-JUL-97, 02:05:12, from:
NO>(PRO)ProStar Plus - 206-941-0317
NO>Auburn, WA
Thank you. I'm not agreeing completely, I'm just saying I agree with the
point that people should get some real numbers before making oddball
guesses.
---
Sent via MailLink, 16-JUL-97, 15:25:18, from:
(WCC)Dreamscape BBS - dsoe.com
Vancouver, BC[0;1m
|