From: guymacon@deltanet.com (Guy Macon)
Subject: Re: 3D game engine for PB?
 
In article , 
stevebasic@aol.com (SteveBasic) wrote:
 
>If I may put in my 2 cents worth...it seems that Reinier is under the
>impression because NASM is exactly what the industry specs say it should be
>that PowerBASIC should make its inline assembly compatable with NASM. The
>problem is that the market for assembly is dominated by MASM. It would be
>economic suicide to spend development dollars to make PowerBASIC  compatable
>with the less popular NASM To paraphrase myself, since the assembler market 
is
>dominated by MASM, that is where the money is at (I know Bob, you allready 
said
>this).
 
Alas, the published official standards are not always the real world
standards.  The REAL standard for webpages is "Whatever works with
Netscape Navigator and Internet Eplorer", despite a HTML standard.
 
Regardless of the merits of the arguments on both sides, PowerBasic
has made it 100% clear that they undertstand the request, and they
have issued a 100% clear answer; No.  Not for free.  Pay them the right
price and they will do it, but otherwise, forget it.
 
Given this clear answer, may I suggest that the posted requests stop?
 
*** QwkNews (tm) v2.1
 * [TN71] alt.lang.powerbasic  POWER_BAS Gateway
--- GEcho 1.20/Pro
---------------