From: Reinier Zwitserloot 
Subject: Re: Pb To C?
 
More reason to support NASM. (Only user-oriented assembler for Linux,
and would be nicely portable as far as that goes across dos and linux).
Uhuh, I'd definitely agree that writing PB for a new operating system, a
linux version would generate the most attraction. Do note that many
Linux users are used to FSF licensing so while the user base is large
the cash is a bit less :-P.
 
Iwan Boskamp wrote:
>
> Frank Cox  writes:
>
> > > If we released compilers for both Linux and OS/2 today the
> > > Linux compiler would outsell the OS/2 compiler by nearly 10 to
> > > 1.
> >
> >If you guys released a Linux compiler, you would certainly attract MY
> >attention.  And I don't even run Linux (yet).
>
> And you would sell me one copy for sure.
>
> Iwan.
 
--
- Ray Zwitserloot.
 
R.Zwitserloot@antispam.BTInternet.com
 Change the E-mail address to reply!
 
----------------------------------------------------
 
*** QwkNews (tm) v2.1
 * [TN71] alt.lang.powerbasic  POWER_BAS Gateway
--- GEcho 1.20/Pro
---------------