NO>ML>camaro, and possibly pay for it later. the extra bucks up front for the
NO>ML>accura will pay off in the long run in the form of repairs, etc.
NO>It occurs to me that you may want to check maintainance costs of these
NO>cars (esp. the acura) before you make this assertion.  The camaro will
NO>almost certainly require more unscheduled repairs, but many of them will
NO>be inexpensive the acura will require much more intensive maintainance
NO>to keep it alive (timing belts alone add up over 200k miles) and acura
NO>parts costs are significantly higher than chevy's.
yes, i am totally aware that the scheduled maintenance and parts are
much more expensive for hondas/accuras (especially the timing belts)....
i was simply stating that accura has a far better repair record than
chevy, and that youre much less likely to get stuck somewhere in an
accura than a chevy. even a 50 dollar repair can turn into 300 if you
have to tow the damn thing 75 miles... sure, each car has its advantages
and downfalls, but i'd still stick with the accura as being less
expensive to maintain over any chevy.
---
Sent via MailLink, 14-JUL-97, 11:33:32, from:
(BUB)