janpa...{at}gmail.com wrote:

> In 1985 the "theory of everything" was developed called the Concept of
> Dipolar Gravity (see the description of it provided on the totaliztic
> web page "dipolar_gravity.htm") which, amongst others, told us how to
> take time under our control. If we follow this theory, by time when 23
> years later I was writing these words in 2008, the human race would
> already defeat the death and people could live forever. People could
> also repair all their past errors. This is because the theory
> indicates how to build time vehicles which allow us to shift our time
> back. In turn when we have such time vehicles, then each time after we
> get old and we are close to death, we could shift ourselves back in
> time and become young again. Also each time we make an error, we could
> shift back in time and repair it. Unfortunately, people have chosen to
> ignore my theory and to make constructing my inventions impossible -
> instead of helping me in my creative efforts. So instead of repetitive
> shifting to our past and living forever, now we can only read from the
> totaliztic web page "timevehicle.htm" how to do this, and we can only
> imagine this wonderful technical device, which on every our wish is
> able to shift us in time to any moment of our own life - under the
> condition, however, that previously we already lived through this
> moment. This moment can lie both in our past, as well as in our
> future. (In order it lies in our future, we must earlier shift back in
> time with the use of this device.) This device allows us also to slow
> down the speed of elapse of our time. For example, we can slow down
> our time so much, that when our surrounding experiences just a
> fraction of second, we ourselves would experience equivalent of
> several hours. In this way we would be able to catch and to carry in
> our bear hands e.g. red-hot iron bars, because for this iron too short
> span of time would elapse to be able to pass to us enough heat to burn
> our hands. This wonder device would also allow us to accelerate our
> elapse of time, so that between two our heartbeats, in the surrounding
> e.g. several hours would pass. In this way we could e.g. pretend to be
> dead, while in fact we are going to be equally alive and active as
> normal. Similarly like with ourselves, this device would also allow
> all other people and all other permanent objects to shift in time.
> Furthermore, in order to make the use of it easier, this device could
> be assembled in a form of a flying vehicle called the
> "Magnocraft" (see the description of it provided on the totaliztic web
> page "magnocraft.htm"). In this way, with the Magnocraft, we would be
> able to not only travel in time, but also travel in space. This
> extraordinary device is the "time vehicle" which I would build by now
> - if I was given a chance. The web page "timevehicle.htm" tries to
> explain most vital principles, scientific facts, and findings
> regarding my time vehicles which I could build for the humanity by now
> if I was given the help from the beginning of my struggles.
>
> Here is how each one of us can see with own eyes that time flows in
> jumps (i.e. time has a discrete character), and thus that my findings
> regarding the possibility to build time vehicles and to live forever
> are correct and can be implemented technically:
>
> YES, in fact there is a commonly accessible proof for the possibility
> of shifting time back. Every reader can see this proof with his or her
> own eyes and in a natural daylight. In order to see it, it is enough
> to find some spinning object which is accelerating from zero to the
> velocity of around 1800 flickers per second, and which has some
> spokes, holes, wings, propellers, unevenness, lines, etc., the
> increasingly faster flickering of which we are able to see with our
> own eyes in a daylight. For example, this object can be a gradually
> accelerating propeller of an airplane or blades of the entrance
> turbine in a jet engine just being started, a hole in a belt pulley
> from a three-phase electric motor which accelerates a heavy farm
> machinery - and thus which gradually increases its spinning from zero
> to a typical for such motors speed of 1800 rev/min, a wheel of a car
> that is overtaking us, and even spokes from the back wheel of our
> bicycle placed on a floor with wheels pointed upwards and gradually
> accelerated by someone when we are tentatively watching it. Well, if
> we carefully watch such slowly accelerating spinning object, then we
> should see a strange change of its direction of rotation. Namely,
> initially our eyes are to notice clearly in which direction it is
> spinning. But at some stage of the acceleration our eyes are to tell
> us that the spinning of this object firstly stopped, and then reversed
> direction in relation to reality. This visual impression taking place
> in daylight, that the direction of spinning of a gradually accelerated
> object is opposite to the real direction of its spin, is the proof
> that time passes in jumps - as the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
> describes this to us (see the description of it provided on the
> totaliztic web page "dipolar_gravity.htm"), and thus also the proof
> that time vehicles can be build. More information about this visual
> proof that time passes in jumps is explained in item #D2 of the web
> page "god_proof.htm" - with the review of scientific proofs for the
> existence of God.
>
> It is enough learn two things in order to understand why exactly this
> visual impression that spinning objects rotate backward is the proof
> that time can be shifted back (and thus that time vehicles can be
> build and that through repetitive shifting time back to years of our
> youth we could live forever). Namely learn (1) the use of so-called
> "stroboscopic lamps" for visual stopping or for changing the direction
> of rotation of spinning objects, and (2) the principle on which time
> works. The use of stroboscopic lamps is described in many sources,
> e.g. in Internet, in manuals for repair of cars, and in textbooks of
> physics. So I am NOT going to repeat it here. In turn to understand
> the principle on which time works, one needs to read to the end of
> item #C1 from my web page "timevehicle.htm", or even better - to the
> end of item #G4 from the web page "dipolar_gravity.htm" - about the
> Concept of Dipolar Gravity. When reading in there about time, we will
> learn that time in fact is the passage of execution control along the
> natural program of our life. This program is composed of sequences of
> individual commands - like present computer programs also are. So the
> execution control completes a command after a command in a jumping
> manner. Thus, when we look at a spinning object, the completion of
> each of these commands in our life program is like a single flash from
> a stroboscopic lamp beamed at a spinning object. So if this object
> spins very fast, then the completion of a single command from our life
> program shows this object to us just only in a specific position.
> Therefore, when the frequency of flickering of spokes in this spinning
> object is close to the frequency of completion of individual commands
> in our life program, then both these frequencies begin to interfere
> with each other - we see this interference as an apparent reversal of
> the direction of spin of the object being watched. A similar effect,
> only that seen exclusively in darkness - instead in the daylight, is
> simulated in spinning objects through the use of "stroboscopic
> lamps".
>
> After the Concept of Dipolar Gravity explained to us what is time (see
> the description of it provided on the totaliztic web page
> "dipolar_gravity.htm"), how time works, and what commonly-known and
> accessible proof each one amongst us can see to obtain the assurance
> that these explanations are true, it should become easy for us to
> understand that shifting time back is possible and relatively easy.
> After all, in order to shift our time back it is enough to catch this
> execution control and to move it to the initial part of the program of
> our life. In turn the device capable to accomplish this is already
> known. It is the so-called "Oscillatory Chamber of the third
> generation" (see the description of it provided on the totaliztic web
> page "oscillatory_chamber.htm") - which I would constructed many years
> ago if not these hordes of hostile people who did everything in their
> power to prevent me from building this wonder device.
>
> So let us now learn regularities which emerge from analyses of earlier
> human inventions - which now allow us to understand better "what is
> going on" with the invention of time vehicles described on this web
> page:
>
> In my research to-date I carried numerous in-depth analyses of
> principles and regularities which rule over inventiveness. Because of
> these analyses I discovered e.g. the so-called "cyclic principle"
> described in chapter B and in subsection K1 from volumes 2 and 10 of
> monograph [1/4] (distributed free of charge from the web page
> "text_1_4.htm"). Also from these analyses emerged the principle
> described in subsection JB7.3 from volume 7 of monograph [1/4],
> stating that "every invention can be completed in the duration of life
> of its inventor". Let us list below these amongst such regularities
> which are to allow us to understand better what really is "going on"
> with the invention of time vehicles described here:
>
> 1. The development of our awareness never exceeds the level of our
> technical and scientific capabilities. Expressing this in other words,
> everything that we invent, we are also able to build already in times
> when we invented it - but only if our contemporaries allow us to build
> it. A best proof for this fact is the "hang-glider" invented already
> by Leonardo Da Vinci, which, however, was constructed only in present
> times - because other people would NOT allow the inventor to build it
> in times when it was invented. If we check materials and design of
> present hang-gliders, then we clearly can see that already in times of
> Leonardo Da Vinci it could be constructed - if people would allow it
> then to be build. In turn we do NOT need to explain where would be the
> humanity today if hang-gliders were already then lifting people to the
> sky.
>
> 2. Our universe is so organised, that everything what can be invented
> can also be constructed. Proofs and justifications of this fact are
> described in subsections JB7.3 and I5.4 from volumes respectively 7
> and 5 of monograph [1/5] (distributed free of charge from the web page
> "text_1_5.htm").
>
> 3. The success with constructing a given invention is accomplished
> only when (a) people from the society close to the inventor are ready
> for accepting this invention, and when (b) the required number of
> sympathetic people from the surrounding of the inventor support his
> activities. In turn when these other people are NOT ready for
> accepting the invention and for giving the inventor their support and
> approval, then the invention either cannot be constructed, or its
> completion will be wasted. An excellent example for this is the
> airplane of a New Zealander named Richard Pearce (see the description
> of it provided on the totaliztic web page "mozajski_uk.htm"). This
> airplane was even build and flown. But other New Zealanders so
> tormented the inventor, that they drove him to the mental hospital -
> so that he was unable to disseminate his invention nor e.g. implement
> it to a factory production.
>
> 4. If someone displays extraordinary perseverance and still completes
> his invention in spite that people from his society are NOT ready for
> accepting it, then this invention is wasted and never enters the
> permanent accomplishments of the humanity. Especially large number of
> cases when just this has happened exist in New Zealand - as examples
> see the invention described on the web page "boiler.htm". and also
> inventions discussed in item #H1 of the web page
> "newzealand_visit.htm".
>
> 5. Every invention is so granted, that the inventor of it is able to
> complete it within the duration of his life - if only other people
> support this inventor in his efforts.
>
> 6. The creative completion of the invention, which original inventors
> are capable to accomplish within several years, other people typically
> extend to hundreds of years. A perfect example of this regularity is
> the so-called "Zhang Heng seismograph" - described on the totaliztic
> web page "seismograph.htm" and also described, amongst others, in my
> conference paper available from the address
>
http://www-ist.massey.ac.nz/conferences/icst05/proceedings/ICST2005-Papers/ICST_112.pdf
> . It warns about the impending earthquake a long time in advance
> before this earthquake strikes. The original inventor completed it
> within a few years. The rest of humanity is unable to rebuild it
> within almost two thousands of years.
>
> 7. All inventions created in "their actual time" always contain
> knowledge which exceeds significantly the knowledge of people
> considering themselves to be "experts" in a given area. After all, the
> very nature of inventions is such that the inventor must be fluent in
> the knowledge which remains unknown to other so-called "experts", and
> also he must see details which other people overlook. Furthermore,
> some requirements of formal "expertise", e.g. the so-called "peer
> reviews", kill in experts the ability for creative and unbiased
> thinking. This is why on the back cover of the book [2P4] by Richard
> Milton, "Forbidden Science", Fourth Estate (6 Salem Road, London W2
> 4BU), London, 1994, ISBN 1-85702-302-1, 265 pages, pb., is stated,
> amongst others - quote: "'In this fascinating and well-argued book,
> Richard exposes a curious feature of many professional scientists:
> they are averse to new ideas' - Focus."). In turn inferior knowledge
> of other "experts" cause that they always viciously, although without
> justification, attack and criticise a given invention. Only inventions
> constructed with a long time delay (e.g. the "hang-glider" mentioned
> before) have time to become known, thus can avoid attacks and vigorous
> criticism.
>
> The above should be complemented with following two "regularities",
> namely:
>
> 8. The official human science developed such a subculture and such
> mechanisms of acting (e.g. these "peer reviews" mentioned before),
> that there is NO chance that other scientists ever undertake the
> construction of time vehicles. So if I do NOT build time vehicle in
> the duration of my life, or at least do NOT direct this construction
> at a correct path, then hundreds of years must pass before someone on
> the Earth will be ready for attempting this building again. (Probably
> I myself will be forced to be born again on the Earth to finish the
> work which I initiated in my present life.) For example I never
> encountered a present scientist who would support the construction of
> such noble and futuristic although simple and elementary device as the
> "Telepathic Pyramid" (see the description of it provided on the
> totaliztic web page "telepathy.htm") - which would allow invalids with
> speech difficulties to communicate just through thoughts. After all,
> the principle of operation of this pyramid utilises telepathic waves -
> which similarly like "time vehicles" described here, also are a kind
> of "taboo" for present scientists.
>
> 9. Judging on the volume of my accomplishments since 1985 (when I
> comprehended the principle on which time works and thus started the
> process of inventing time vehicles described here) we can be sure that
> if then I would receive from others the help that I need, until today
> I would build time vehicles. About my creative potential perfectly
> certifies the large number of extraordinary devices which I managed to
> invent, discoveries which I accomplished, theories of the type
> "paradigm shift" which I developed, proofs for the correctness of my
> findings which I identified and pointed to others, and scientific
> monographs which I managed to write. And we must remember that I was
> forced to create all these in hugely hostile conditions in which other
> people would probably just sit and cry, and which (conditions) very
> cautiously and briefly are mentioned, amongst others, on the web page
> "pajak_jan_uk.htm" - about myself, means my autobiography. After all,
> in the country I was born they tried to shoot me, in turn in the
> country I escaped to they do not have work for me for a majority of
> time, nor even consider me eligible for a dole. Thus, instead of
> creating, discovering, inventing, researching, constructing, and
> making progress, to which obviously I have in-born inclinations, the
> majority of my energy and time I was (and still am) forced to waste on
> seeking jobs or on wander throughout the world to earn for a slice of
> bread. Also the majority of what I created I was forced to develop
> while vegetating in a leaking flat only slightly larger than an
> average lift, not having at home even a good screwdriver, not even
> dreaming of having an Internet, and while with growing horror I spend
> each cent from my savings - as I may need it even more in my older
> age.
>
> So try to help me actively already now, so that when your life comes
> close to the end, you will NOT be sorry that you ignored my appeals
> for help in the completion of time vehicles - which by pressing a
> button would shift you back to years of your youth and allow you to
> enjoy life forever!
>
> The present "television-based" way of living taught us impassivity and
> exclusion from all proofs and from everything that happens in the
> distant world. After all, continually there is a war somewhere and
> always people die - but we do NOT have influence on it. Continually
> someone works on a new medicine - but we have not "caught" yet this
> particular disease. Somewhere is possible to earn millions - but we
> can't be there. Etc., etc. So when we hear about a next "distant"
> development, i.e. about the "time vehicle", then we also treat it with
> equal passiveness and exclusion. We consider this vehicle to be just a
> "private business" of some Jan Pajak - while we do NOT have anything
> to do with it. However, the reality turns out to be exactly opposite.
> The time vehicle is NOT just a private business of Jan Pajak, but an
> important business of each inhabitant of the Earth. After all, it is
> going to allow us to defeat the death. In turn every inhabitant of the
> Earth one day is going to be on the so-called "dead-bed". Also
> everyone must finally give to death all these ones whom he or she
> loves the most. Thus everyone who then recalls that much earlier could
> actually help me to build the time vehicle - which by pressing a
> button would shift him and people most close to him back to years of
> their youth and allow them to enjoy life forever, will be very sorry
> that had not helped this Jan Pajak. Therefore, you should try to save
> yourself from this indescribable sorrow that is to come at the time of
> death. Do not wait until it is going to be too late. Begin to help
> already now. After all, even if you are poor like a church mouse, and
> have NO influence at any decision, you still have eyes which are able
> to see proofs that I am describing here, rational thinking which allow
> you to appreciate these proofs, and also have fingers capable of
> pointing these proofs to other people. You still have mouth capable of
> convincing, logic that allows you to detect, disclose, and fight out
> unjustified attacks on my accomplishments, constructive mind that can
> deduce how to effectively help me, and a pen capable to act at a
> distance. So even without our meeting and direct support, you still
> can help me indirectly, e.g. through just preparing people for the
> acceptance of the idea of this revolutionary invention and by creation
> of the atmosphere in which it is the people's common wish that my time
> vehicles are build.
>
> The explanations presented above are adopted from part #A of the
> totaliztic web page "timevehicle.htm", update of 27 October 2008, or
> later. The latest update of this web page should be available from
> several web sites of totalizm. One amongst these web sites is "
> www.jan-pajak.com " - which is available under the address
> http://jan-pajak.com/timevehicle.htm and which always presents (just
> for brief periods of time) the most recently updated web page of
> totalizm. Other web sites which have the page "timevehicle.htm"
> include http://ufonauci.w.interia.pl/timevehicle.htm ,
> http://totalizm.nazwa.pl/timevehicle.htm ,
> http://members.fortunecity.com/timevehicle/timevehicle.htm and
> http://milicz.fateback.com/timevehicle.htm .
>
> It is also worth to know that practically all totaliztic web pages are
> available at each address (server) of totalizm. Therefore
> independently from the web page "evil.htm", each address (server)
> linked from here should also offer all other web pages of totalizm -
> unless some of these pages were sabotaged, or are so new that I had no
> time yet to upload these at a given address (server). (But in a case
> when for some reasons a page is unavailable under a given address,
> still at this address a MENU should be available which has links to
> other addresses (servers) of totalizm, on which a given web page
> should already be accessible.) Thus, if someone wishes to view
> descriptions from any other totaliztic web page, e.g. from a web page
> listed in this post, or listed in other totaliztic posts, then in the
> above addresses the name "evil.htm" is just enough to exchange for a
> name of the web page that he or she wishes to view, e.g. for the name
> of web page "oscillatory_chamber.htm",
"eco_cars.htm", "boiler.htm",
> "fe_cell.htm", "free_energy.htm",
"telekinetics.htm",
> "dipolar_gravity.htm", "nirvana.htm",
"totalizm.htm", "evil.htm",
> "god.htm", "god_proof.htm", "bible.htm",
"evolution.htm",
> "wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm", "malbork_uk.htm",
"memorial.htm",
> "newzealand.htm", "partia_totalizmu_uk.htm",
"fruit.htm",
> "text_1_5.htm", "explain.htm",
"day26.htm", "ufo_proof.htm",
> "katrina.htm", etc., etc.
>
> If here the above text is difficult to read, or links from it refuse
> to work, then it is worth to know that this post is repeated on
> several blogs of totalizm, subsequent ones amongst which can be
> accessed at following internet addresses:
> http://www.getablog.net/totalizm
> http://totalizm.wordpress.com
> http://totalizm.blox.pl/html
> http://totalizm.myblog.net
> On these blogs it is also worth to read the previous post number
> #159E, which contains another presentation of the visual proof that
> time passes in jumps (i.e. that time has a discrete nature). Thus, the
> content of the previous post complements the content of this post.
>
>
> With the totaliztic salute,
> Jan Pajak

Time machine huh? Let me know when i can have my 5 minutes back.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32