Now if i can just figure out why this reply didnt go where i intended it to 
go...


...
"Felix Dzherzhinsky"  wrote in message 
news:4911bb07$0$5464$9a566e8b{at}news.aliant.net...
> You presented as proof an optical illusion. You thus showed all readers 
> that your 'theory' is naught but mumbo-jumbo.That effect has nothing to do 
> with 'time flowing in jumps' and has everything to do with the way the 
> human eye sees interrupted images.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32