Sunday September 28 1997 20:14, Dan Triplett waxed eloquently to
All.......everybody!:
DT> Hey....it's too quiet in here! Help, I am going through
DT> withdrawal!
Don't be insulted or take personally what follows. I am reacting to an
documentary I saw last week.
DT> Lets get a good topic going. Hmmmmmm any ideas?
DT>
DT> Whole Language (again?)
Is this a worn out subject or is it that teachers don't fully understand it?
DT> Invented Spelling?
An important part of the writing process in a truly whole language programme.
Most teachers I know who stuff this up haven't understood how or where
teacher intervention fits in the process.
Down under, here in New Zealand, we have a publishing company called Wendy
Pye Limited. Wendy's books are published with the Sunshine label and used
extensively in this country and overseas to teach reading.
Last week on New Zealand Television there was a documentary in which a
critique was made of the Wendy Pye readers. The opponents of her books were
American and Australian teachers. It seems to me that the criticism was that
the books were not sequenced in such a way as to enable a teacher to teach
using a phonics method.
I was amazed that no New Zealand teachers were interviewed. Furthermore I
was astounded by the fact that the teachers interviewed wanted a prescriptive
phonics curriculum which told them to use which book when.
Why not use a whole language approach???
Surely we are not the only teachers in the world who use a child centred and
needs based approaches to teaching.
The Wendy Pye readers are leveled from an emergent level through early
reading to fluency across some 7 or 8 levels. The vocabulary in the emergent
texts use a basic high frequency words such as;
I, am, and, the, come, look, for, here, is, me, he, she, you, are, in, went,
school, go, on, up.
(These words will be those first use in their own writing)
The pictures provide cues for the interest words. As students are exposed to
print and the conventions of print; ie that print carries a message and that
the message is consistent, concepts about directionality, learning to look at
print and use letter cues, the student will begin to learn to read.
It should also be noted that the classroom programme including oral and
written language needs to have a lot of alphabet work where students are
exposed, immersed and engage in recognising the letter sounds that
correspond to the hierglyphics that we decipher as letters which form words.
The teacher needs to know the respective texts and should be skilled enough
and discerning enough to identify the appropriate texts for the needs of the
student to facilitate the process. Phonics while important is only part of
the decoding of text.
As students gain control of language, learn to read for meaning, to self
correct to use cross checking strategies including the visual features and
sounds of words and the list goes on, they become confident and learn to
read. IMHO it takes about 3 years for the average student to become a fluent
reader. Beyond that the biggest thing is the development of the students
knowledge and experience of the world so that they are able to comprehend
what is contained in the print they read.
It would naive of me to try and explain all that is involved in the reading
process to educators many of whom will have considerably more experience than
me but it is also astounding that there are teachers who don't have a clue
about the process. The fact that their students learn to read is more good
luck than good management.
Well Dan, if this doesn't stir some debate then it will be time to check if
we are still alive.
Cheers
Chris
-----------------------------------------------------------------
** email address Fidonet SysOp **
** Chris.Lord@matiere.hn.pl.net 3:774/1000 **
** Matiere Fido/UUCP Gateway Matiere Cyberspace Connection **
-----------------------------------------------------------------
... Forecast for tonight: Dark
--- GoldED 2.51.A1026 UNREG
---------------
* Origin: Matiere School, King Country, New Zealand. (3:774/1000)
|