Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.adelphia.com!news.adelphia.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 20:19:53 -0600
Newsgroups: fidonet.tech
From: TOM_WALKER@f140.n123.z1
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 07:53:00 -0500
Subject: A find
Message-ID: 
Organization: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG
 789
 250/514
Lines: 18
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.54.66.112
 properly
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com fidonet.tech:42

JB> TW> Come on Now, what practical CPU upgrade do you see for a 466 and 366
JB> TW> Celeron???

JB>I know one will accept a 900MHz VIA chip, and the ATX will take a Slot 1 CPU
JB>(PII?)

JB> TW> Even if you got the slightly faster CPU Free is the performance
JB> TW> increase really worth the effort.

JB>Double to triple the speed - I'd say so. The first is a "Pocket PC", and the
JB>third used to run 24x7 as a TV tuner/vid control centre. Linux is a SMOKIN O
JB>for the Pocket PC, and it worked the K6 better than W98 when I tried it
JB>yesterday.

 Tripiling the Speed of the CPU WILL NOT TRIPLE the speed of the
 computer operation by a long ways. In fact things like memory Speed
 and ammount, HD speed etc are FAR more important then Raw CPU speed in
 "overall" system speed..