Bob Officer wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:39:22 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks,
> "www.freedomtofascism.com"  wrote:
> 
>>"Bob Officer"  wrote in message 
>>news:1l28m4t7ppksa191pg9496ecr9lq9maegf{at}4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:11:56 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>> www.freedomtofascism.com  The top posting
idiot posted:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:09:51 -0800, Bob Officer

>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:06:01 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>>"www.freedomtofascism.com"
 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The most secret of all weapons is now in orbit
according to NASA and the 
>>>>>>US
>>>>>>Government. Russia has perfected some type of
ant-matter ray and is now
>>>>>>deployed in orbit somewhere over the Atlantic. It
can strike any city in 
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>eastern half of the US and half of Europe. This
spectacular weapon emits 
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>beam that expands to about 450 feet diameter or
about 137 meters when it
>>>>>>hits the target at ground level. According to
Malcolm Jaswerski of NASA, 
>>>>>>he
>>>>>>believes this weapon can literally vaporize all
matter within the 
>>>>>>diameter
>>>>>>of the beam. Russia now hold the ace in the hole
according to Malcolm. 
>>>>>>With
>>>>>>a flip of the switch they can vaporize a city block
in a matter of a 
>>>>>>couple
>>>>>>of seconds. Once the beams emitter is charged it
can unleash a bolt of
>>>>>>anti-matter in a second or two.
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL...
>>>>>
>>>>>Poor alexa...
>>>>>
>>>>>What type of containment vessel to they keep the
antimatter in....
>>>>>
>>>>>how does the antimatter ray beams travel through the atmosphere
>>>>>without encountering any matter. (hint: the air is made
up of matter
>>>>>and each encounter with a piece of matter will destroy
an equal mass
>>>>>of antimatter.
>>>>>
>>>>>A quick back of envelope computing it would take the
output equal to
>>>>>all the energy produced in the world month to power
this device long
>>>>>enough to produce enough antimatter to reach the ground
level with a
>>>>>cone of 450 feet.  The big problem would be to transport enough
>>>>>matter to make the antimatter equal to the size of the
cone of matter
>>>>>which you will be trying to destroy.
>>>>>
>>>>>Also Alexa, there seems to be a problem, there is no
"Malcolm
>>>>>Jaswerski" listed at NASA.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Know what gravity is yet, moron troll?
>>>
>>> Oops, Alexa, antimatter doesn't share attraction to matter.
>>>
>>> Also there isn't any person named Malcolm Jaswerski working or
>>> attatched to NASA.>
>>
>>Your mental block is because you've been brainwashed into believing a lie. 
> 
> Which statement are you calling a lie? 
> 
>>Most has to do with your low intelligence. 
> 
> Well alexa, you seem to have lower intelligence than a common fish.
> unable to avoid biting any hook baited with nonsense.
> 
>>You need to start thinking for 
>>yourself and quit the showdow chasing and look at reality around you.
> 
> Do you know how much energy it would take to create one gram of
> antimatter? It would take example one gram of matter to neutralize
> one gram of antimatter. A cone of air with a base of 450ft would
> contain how many grams of matter? as the antimatter hits the air, the
> heat from the annihilated matter would covert the nearby air to
> plasma, that plasm wold continue to intercept the antimatter. no
> antimatter would make it to the surface of the earth. 
> 
> The problem is you keep falling for pseudoscholarly nonsense.
> 
> If you took ten seconds to think for yourself you would realize how
> silly this claim of yours really is.
> 
>>This post originated from Supernews,
>> not newsrazor.net. The idiot posting
>>from newsrazor.net is forging the nym
>> www.freedomtofascism.com in hopes that
>> people reading Google will think we're
>> the same person.
> 
> 
> No sane person would try to imitate you.
> I suspect you are socking yourself, because you are an common usenet
> attention whore.


-- 
ah
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32