-> As for Sega, you're also proclaiming a lot of things about them that
-> have yet to be proven, and are based largely on the people - not the
-> product.
[SNIP]
-> I'm not saying that the Katana CAN'T fail.  Atari's Jaguar was more
-> powerful than the SNES and Genesis it had to compete with initially,
-> yet the company let it flounder.  But the Katana itself should
-> succeed!
        ...And Sega is not guilty of letting it's systems flounder? Have
we forgotten their last three projects so far; Sega CD, 32X, and now the
Saturn? I think their track record is proclaiming enough proof of their
ability, or willingness, to support their game machines. Shall we even
forget the Master System and Game Gear? Gamers today can probably tell
you what a NES and a Game Boy are, but most have no idea about the SMS
and Game Gear.
        With Sega's record it looks like the Genesis was more of a fluke
than a show of Sega's ability to successfully market a game machine.
--- PCBoard (R) v15.22/M 2
---------------