On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:39:22 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks,
"www.freedomtofascism.com"  wrote:

>"Bob Officer"  wrote in message 
>news:1l28m4t7ppksa191pg9496ecr9lq9maegf{at}4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:11:56 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>> www.freedomtofascism.com  The top posting idiot posted:
>>
>>>On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:09:51 -0800, Bob Officer

>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:06:01 -0600, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>>>"www.freedomtofascism.com"
 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>The most secret of all weapons is now in orbit
according to NASA and the 
>>>>>US
>>>>>Government. Russia has perfected some type of
ant-matter ray and is now
>>>>>deployed in orbit somewhere over the Atlantic. It can
strike any city in 
>>>>>the
>>>>>eastern half of the US and half of Europe. This
spectacular weapon emits 
>>>>>a
>>>>>beam that expands to about 450 feet diameter or about
137 meters when it
>>>>>hits the target at ground level. According to Malcolm
Jaswerski of NASA, 
>>>>>he
>>>>>believes this weapon can literally vaporize all matter
within the 
>>>>>diameter
>>>>>of the beam. Russia now hold the ace in the hole
according to Malcolm. 
>>>>>With
>>>>>a flip of the switch they can vaporize a city block in
a matter of a 
>>>>>couple
>>>>>of seconds. Once the beams emitter is charged it can
unleash a bolt of
>>>>>anti-matter in a second or two.
>>>>
>>>>LOL...
>>>>
>>>>Poor alexa...
>>>>
>>>>What type of containment vessel to they keep the antimatter in....
>>>>
>>>>how does the antimatter ray beams travel through the atmosphere
>>>>without encountering any matter. (hint: the air is made up of matter
>>>>and each encounter with a piece of matter will destroy an equal mass
>>>>of antimatter.
>>>>
>>>>A quick back of envelope computing it would take the output equal to
>>>>all the energy produced in the world month to power this device long
>>>>enough to produce enough antimatter to reach the ground level with a
>>>>cone of 450 feet.  The big problem would be to transport enough
>>>>matter to make the antimatter equal to the size of the cone of matter
>>>>which you will be trying to destroy.
>>>>
>>>>Also Alexa, there seems to be a problem, there is no "Malcolm
>>>>Jaswerski" listed at NASA.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Know what gravity is yet, moron troll?
>>
>> Oops, Alexa, antimatter doesn't share attraction to matter.
>>
>> Also there isn't any person named Malcolm Jaswerski working or
>> attatched to NASA.>
>
>Your mental block is because you've been brainwashed into believing a lie. 

Which statement are you calling a lie? 

>Most has to do with your low intelligence. 

Well alexa, you seem to have lower intelligence than a common fish.
unable to avoid biting any hook baited with nonsense.

>You need to start thinking for 
>yourself and quit the showdow chasing and look at reality around you.

Do you know how much energy it would take to create one gram of
antimatter? It would take example one gram of matter to neutralize
one gram of antimatter. A cone of air with a base of 450ft would
contain how many grams of matter? as the antimatter hits the air, the
heat from the annihilated matter would covert the nearby air to
plasma, that plasm wold continue to intercept the antimatter. no
antimatter would make it to the surface of the earth. 

The problem is you keep falling for pseudoscholarly nonsense.

If you took ten seconds to think for yourself you would realize how
silly this claim of yours really is.

>This post originated from Supernews,
> not newsrazor.net. The idiot posting
>from newsrazor.net is forging the nym
> www.freedomtofascism.com in hopes that
> people reading Google will think we're
> the same person.


No sane person would try to imitate you.
I suspect you are socking yourself, because you are an common usenet
attention whore.


-- 
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32