>  CC>   
>  CC>     33600
>  CC>     whatever
>  CC>     whatever
>  CC>     whatever
>  CC>     V32B,V42B
>  CC>   
>
>  CC> This is my preference because you're declaring a
"block" of common
>  CC> elements which are flags that describe things.  Each flag is then
named
>  CC> based on what it is describing.
>
> OK, I can dig it.
>

I may want to see a minor change to the above.  I'm trying to think if it
would make better sense to list the flags in the following fashion:


  33600
  whatever
  whatever
  whatever
  V32B
  V42B
  [misc_flags_here_too_to_validate]


This way whatever program is reading the XML nodelist knows to just
concatenate all fields that have the same tag names (ie.
compression="V32B,V42B")  ... What do you think of that?

> And because of this I think the best way to go is child for almost if not
> everything.

Sounds good to me :o) ...
Chris



--- Mail-ennium/32 v1.01.301.9/#01-0001