JJ> CC>JJ> I can type more, if anyone is interested.
JJ> CC>I am if you got the time.  On your 2nd example, how does a
JJ> CC>simple misspelling corrupt the whole translation?
JJ> 
JJ> Ok...I'll type a little at a type.
JJ> 
JJ> According to Eldred Thomas, the misspelling is a small example of the
JJ> corruption, and it continues on throughout the translation.
JJ> 
JJ> From Bible Versions...To Test the True Character of Your Bible by
JJ> Eldred Thomas.
 
Okay, I'll jump in with both left feet.  Is Eldred Thomas' premise that
the KJV1611 is the one, the only true translation?  That all others are
corrupt imitations spawned by Satan?  Seems then that anything found there
would be suspect.  It's a 'proof' of the KJV not a test or unbiased
comparision of various translations.  I'm sure that you have others who
have 'proved' the inerrancy of the KJV1611 and I'll try to track down
Mr. Thomas' book and see what's there.  
Before I sent this out I found an old article by a Mr. Ruckman.  In
the railing against BJU and BJ III, IV etc. he made a point about the use
of the word 'child' vs 'servant' in Acts 4:27,30.  A little better case
than a variant spelling of a place name.  Didn't we just start using
Bejing instead of Peking?
... nfx/win v3.0 [C0000] If you didn't do it, don't count on it being done. 
  
... nfx/win v3.0 [C0000] 
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------