| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: fidomsg.xml |
SL>> If they were received via HTTP GET, then the sensibly reply method SL>> would be HTTP POST :) SL> addendum: SL> HTTP provides authentication, as well as firewall transparency and SL> encryption via SSL. Using standard tools and libraries will allow your SL> fidosoft to gain IPv6 capabilities as and when they become available in SL> your OS. Things like Binkp, AFAIK, are not IPv6 compatible, and the SL> skills required to update them may not be available when the time SL> comes. Email, FTP, and HTTP are done for us for free. Very true. The focus areas will be the user technology to access the messages both online and offline and a technology to merge the messages from system to system. Of course NNTP offers that as well. The focus should be technology that will draw the most users to the messages areas, thus making the BBSes popular. To keep things interesting it would nice to do something no one else is doing, but yet move closer to more widely used technologies. SQL, XML and http, nntp, smtp... standard stuff that we could attempt to add some interesting twists to. I look at the current attempts to use the internet with fidonet and everything is behind the times technology wise, nothing is cutting edge or even close. In case no one has noticed message traffic in fidonet has started dropping again at a faster rate than say a year ago. I realize part of it is seasonal... and while the nodelist is not shrinking very fast, the nodelist is not an accurate representation of the number of sysops we have in fidonet. And the vast majority of the system left in fidonet have no idea about running a system that supports points OR BBS users. Most of them have probably never seen the setup of a BBS! I just said a fidonet goodbye and removed the links for a long time fidonet sysop in email a few minutes ago. While I've added three points in the last month; they are only interested in a few specific message areas. They didn't care which technology it took to get the messages to/from them. And the easiest thing out there right now is Fidolook. Like you, I've seen the technology that is out there and I have no doubt that things can be done better to make the user experience better. With best regards, Dale --- Fidolook Lite FTN stub* Origin: FidoHub Point 1 (1:379/1.1) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.