From: Al and Masha Sten-Clanton 
Subject: Re: Why the NFB
Dave, I think it's time for me to express my appreciation for how you
moderate this conference.  There has indeed been a good deal of
freewheeling debate here, and I'm glad of it.  I suspect that we could use
more time for such discussions during national convention sessions, but
I'm sure this conference can help many of us to be more productive and
fine-tuned in whatever discussions we do have at convention time.  Thank
you for your work!
Al
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, David Andrews wrote:
> 
> 
> There have been assertions here that the NFB doesn't allow debate.  I was
> just saying that it isn't true.
> 
> David andrews
> At 11:55 AM 4/15/98 +0500, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >On 1998-04-15 NFB-Talk@NFBnet.org said:
> > NF>I see lots of debate here, and this list is sponsored by the
> >NFB,
> > NF>and paid for largely by the NFB.
> > NF>David Andrews
> >What does that have to do with anything?  Are you implying that
> >we shouldn't have debate because the N.F.B. pays for the list?
> >Or are you saying that the N.F.B. leadership has done nothing to
> >stop the ongoing debate even though it pays for the list?  They
> >know they can't stop this discussion by any other means other
> >than shutting down the list or by removing those of us who voice
> >differing views which would confirm what we are saying.
> >
> >Harvey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
---
 # Origin: NFBnet  Internet Email Gateway (1:282/1045)
---------------