Hi andrew -- on Feb 26 2018 at 22:12, you wrote:


ac> OK, confirmed here.

ac> It's picking the wrong next area, but there seems to be a pattern to
ac> it in my testing. I just don't understand why yet.

Oh good, I've not lost my mind - at least, not this pat! :-)

I'm going to drop back a version, since not missing is more important than the
empty area fix! :-)



Cheers... Dallas

--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+