From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0417_01C7B33B.C418F200
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   I only mentioned that if the server's network load is an issue it can =
optimize it.  You haven't given any indication that there is even an =
issue here beyond the one of your imagination.  And again, if you don't =
like thumbnails you can turn them off.

Rich

  "Geo."  wrote in message
news:4678fe40{at}w3.nls.net...
  Ok Rich, nothing is impossible. I'm just trashing the idea of =
schleping this=20
  off on the server when clearly it's vista that needs to meet my 2x4.

  Geo.

  "Rich"  wrote in message news:4678ae23{at}w3.nls.net...
     Just because you don't see how doesn't mean that it doesn't or =
can't=20
  happen.  As an ISP don't you see bandwidth throttled by usage even if =
you=20
  don't support this yourself?

  Rich

    "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:4678558d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    Well in this case the user would like to prioritize, in fact the =
user=20
  would
    like to prioritize it right off the list of things to do.. 

    I honestly don't see how a server could prioritize it since it's =
simple=20
  file
    access which would all look the same from the server end.

    Geo.

    "Rich"  wrote in message news:4677f45d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
       Idle time not idle network.  I don't know if network is =
prioritized.
    Regardless the server can prioritize if it wishes.

    Rich
      "Mike N."  wrote in message
    news:d5ff73hhplbrdh50308muh71gourhctds0{at}4ax.com...
      On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:59:36 -0700, "Rich"  wrote:

      >It is a background activity.  It's not clear why you are =
concerned=20
  about
    idle time activity.

         Who defines the activity as "idle time"?   The system doing the
      activity?    What if you have other systems sharing the bandwidth =
who=20
  need
      it?    Does the "idle time" activity set a QOS bit that can be =
used to
      prioritize traffic?

------=_NextPart_000_0417_01C7B33B.C418F200
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable






   I only mentioned that if the server's
network load is =
an issue=20
it can optimize it.  You haven't given any indication that there
is = even an=20
issue here beyond the one of your imagination.  And again, if you
= don=92t=20
like thumbnails you can turn them off.
 
Rich
 

  "Geo." <mailto:georger{at}nls.net=20
 
href=3D"georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:4678fe40{at}w3.nls.net...Ok=
 Rich,=20
  nothing is impossible. I'm just trashing the idea of schleping this =
off on=20
  the server when clearly it's vista that needs to meet my=20
  2x4.Geo."Rich"
<{at}> wrote in message news:4678ae23{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
  Just because you don't see how doesn't mean that it doesn't or can't=20
  happen.  As an ISP don't you see bandwidth throttled by usage =
even if=20
  you don't support this
yourself?Rich 
"Geo." =
<mailto:georger{at}nls.net=20
 
href=3D"georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message  * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)

SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786

@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267