From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_03CE_01C7B2B9.7F70C7E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Just because you don't see how doesn't mean that it doesn't or can't =
happen.  As an ISP don't you see bandwidth throttled by usage even if = you
don't support this yourself?

Rich

  "Geo."  wrote in message =
news:4678558d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Well in this case the user would like to prioritize, in fact the user =
would=20
  like to prioritize it right off the list of things to do.. 

  I honestly don't see how a server could prioritize it since it's =
simple file=20
  access which would all look the same from the server end.

  Geo.

  "Rich"  wrote in message news:4677f45d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
     Idle time not idle network.  I don't know if network is =
prioritized.=20
  Regardless the server can prioritize if it wishes.

  Rich
    "Mike N."  wrote in message=20
  news:d5ff73hhplbrdh50308muh71gourhctds0{at}4ax.com...
    On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:59:36 -0700, "Rich"  wrote:

    >It is a background activity.  It's not clear why you are concerned =
about=20
  idle time activity.

       Who defines the activity as "idle time"?   The system doing the
    activity?    What if you have other systems sharing the bandwidth =
who need
    it?    Does the "idle time" activity set a QOS bit that can be used =
to
    prioritize traffic?=20

------=_NextPart_000_03CE_01C7B2B9.7F70C7E0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable






   Just because you don't see how doesn't mean that it =
doesn't or=20
can't happen.  As an ISP don=92t you see bandwidth throttled by =
usage even if=20
you don't support this yourself?
 
Rich
 

  "Geo." <mailto:georger{at}nls.net=20
 
href=3D"georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:4678558d$1{at}w3.nls.net...Well=20
  in this case the user would like to prioritize, in fact the user would =

  like to prioritize it right off the list of things to do..=20
  <g>I honestly don't see how a server
could prioritize it =
since=20
  it's simple file access which would all look the same from the =
server=20
  end.Geo."Rich"
<{at}> wrote in message news:4677f45d$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
  =20
  Idle time not idle network.  I don't know if network is =
prioritized.=20
  Regardless the server can prioritize if it =
wishes.Rich =20
  "Mike N." <mailto:mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net=20
 
href=3D"mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net>">mailto:mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net">mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net>
=
wrote in=20
  message news:d5ff73hhplb=
rdh50308muh71gourhctds0{at}4ax.com... =20
  On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:59:36 -0700, "Rich" <{at}> =
wrote: =20
  >It is a background activity.  It's not clear why you are =
concerned=20
  about idle time
activity.     Who =
defines the=20
  activity as "idle time"?   The system doing
the =20
  activity?    What if you have other systems
sharing the =

  bandwidth who need  it?   
Does the "idle =
time"=20
  activity set a QOS bit that can be used to  prioritize =
traffic?=20


------=_NextPart_000_03CE_01C7B2B9.7F70C7E0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5