From: "Glenn Meadows" 

Thanks Antti, appreciated. I'm watching the server right now to keep an eye
on max in use at any point in time, and to keep an eye on CPU usage as
well.

--

Glenn M.
"Antti Kurenniemi"  wrote in
message news:4671916f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Then I think it might benefit from the extra memory. Here's MS's site
> about the max memory amounts:
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx - so
> it's 4 G for W2k Server, 8 for W2k Advanced Server and 32 for the
> Datacenter version.
>
>
> Antti Kurenniemi
>
> "Glenn Meadows"  wrote in message
> news:467183c3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> It's mostly for one of the servers we run Terminal Services on, where
>> multiple people are running the same apps in parallel accessing another
>> server with SQL on it.  Finance applications mostly.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Glenn M.
>> "Antti Kurenniemi" 
wrote in message
>> news:46717cf6{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Windows 2000 can handle more, but apps usually can't use more than 2
>>> apiece, or 3 (or was it 4) with some option enabled.
>>>
>>>
>>> Antti Kurenniemi
>>>
>>> "Glenn Meadows"  wrote in message
>>> news:467179c3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> OK, here's a question for you.
>>>>
>>>> Windows 2000 Server.  Is it limited to 3gig or so RAM useable?
>>>>
>>>> We have several Dell 2850 servers, that allow up to 12gig
of ram in 6
>>>> slots of 2 gig each (has to be installed in pairs).
>>>>
>>>> The question is, will 2k server be able to use anything
more than 3 or
>>>> 3.5 gig as the Crucial.com web site advises, or do we need
to consider
>>>> upgrading to Windows 2003 64 bit server? AND if we do that, will the
>>>> existing 32 bit apps be able to utilize that memory if needed?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Glenn M.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5