From: "Antti Kurenniemi" 

Then I think it might benefit from the extra memory. Here's MS's site about
the max memory amounts:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx - so
it's 4 G for W2k Server, 8 for W2k Advanced Server and 32 for the
Datacenter version.


Antti Kurenniemi

"Glenn Meadows"  wrote in message
news:467183c3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> It's mostly for one of the servers we run Terminal Services on, where
> multiple people are running the same apps in parallel accessing another
> server with SQL on it.  Finance applications mostly.
>
> --
>
> Glenn M.
> "Antti Kurenniemi" 
wrote in message
> news:46717cf6{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Windows 2000 can handle more, but apps usually can't use more than 2
>> apiece, or 3 (or was it 4) with some option enabled.
>>
>>
>> Antti Kurenniemi
>>
>> "Glenn Meadows"  wrote in message
>> news:467179c3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> OK, here's a question for you.
>>>
>>> Windows 2000 Server.  Is it limited to 3gig or so RAM useable?
>>>
>>> We have several Dell 2850 servers, that allow up to 12gig of ram in 6
>>> slots of 2 gig each (has to be installed in pairs).
>>>
>>> The question is, will 2k server be able to use anything more than 3 or
>>> 3.5 gig as the Crucial.com web site advises, or do we need to consider
>>> upgrading to Windows 2003 64 bit server? AND if we do that, will the
>>> existing 32 bit apps be able to utilize that memory if needed?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Glenn M.
>>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5