TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: xml.dbms
to: CHRIS CRANFORD
from: Dale Ross
date: 2003-01-12 02:22:34
subject: Re: XML Nodelist Proposal

CC> I may want to see a minor change to the above.  I'm trying to think if
 CC> it would make better sense to list the flags in the following fashion:

 CC> 
 CC>   33600
 CC>   whatever
 CC>   whatever
 CC>   whatever
 CC>   V32B
 CC>   V42B
 CC>   [misc_flags_here_too_to_validate]
 CC> 

 CC> This way whatever program is reading the XML nodelist knows to just
 CC> concatenate all fields that have the same tag names (ie.
 CC> compression="V32B,V42B")  ... What do you think of that?

hmm... I agree that they should all be children instead of attributes. Is it
"ok" to have two children of the same name under the same parent?

With best regards, Dale Ross.  E-mail: Dale.Ross{at}p1.f1.n379.z1.fidonet.org

--- Fidolook Lite FTN stub 
* Origin: FidoHub Point 1 (1:379/1.1)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.