RH> Not exactly true, at least not of all Basics. Many do
RH> compile to an intermediate code, which runs quite fast.
PERL compiles directly to an executable - it just doesn't write
that executable to any file. So, you get all the speed of C -
actually faster than many C programs since its doing alot of
optimizations that most C programmers are too lazy to code.
RH> But then most C compilers require compiling as a
RH> seperate operation. I rather prefer the Basic
RH> approach, as it speeds program development.
I prefer the PERL approach - its faster than BASIC, and I never
have to run a compiler or interpretter. It also has more features
than any other language I know of (unless you count restrictions
and strong typing a feature).
--- Maximus/2 3.01
[+/175 of 200/107 Mins] = * FIDO: ST_PROG =: Next...
* Origin: Wylie Connection 33.6K USR V34+ DS 214-442-0388 (1:124/7028)
|