Hello Maurice,
On Sat, Dec 07 2024 07:45:47 -0600, you wrote ..
> That is why we're giving it at least 7 characters to play with. I
> have been known to wrap entire messages to 72 characters just to take
> care of their obvious handicap. Them were the good ol' days.
"Good ol' days?" I don't think much has changed.
> Strong like bull, smart like tractor?
Pretty much!
> As far as I know, quoting has never been covered in ftn standards.
> The tradition has become to put the initials of the quotee in the
> quote prefix along with the '>' character. However I think just the
> '>' character is more universal and makes things easier, especially
> when using vim or nano as the MSG editor of choice.
Yeah, but common sense would reveal that you probably shouldn't _eliminate_ random text within sentences from the original message that you are quoting. I can see entire sentences or paragraphs, but not whatever is dangling at the end of 80 columns. Darn tractors. :)
The '> ' prefix is definitely more universal, not only for FTN, but newsgroups and email as well. However, initials don't bother me much if they're there or not, as I don't usually look at them, and normally don't quote past the first level anyways.
Regards,
Nick
... He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
|