Hey Nick!

This is a 'fold -s -w 69' 
 > Great news. Thanks for the confirmation. It's definitely nice to get 
 > back to nano. I mess up far too many times while in a vim session, 
 > as I'm just not used to it at all.

Whereas this is with nano 'set fill 68'
 > Great news. Thanks for the confirmation. It's definitely nice to get 
 > back to nano. I mess up far too many times while in a vim session, 
 > as I'm just not used to it at all.

I had to adjust the fill to one character less in nano than in fold in order for them to produce the same result.  I am guessing the same for vim.

I am more confused now than I was when I just bash scripted replies with quoted text.  However I think we're on the right track if our goal is to make this more compatible with a number of editors, nano being a very good choice for most.

Life is good,
Maurice

-o    o-   o-  -o
 (\  /)   /)    (\
 ^^  ^^   ^^    ^^
... Wiš swiše m‘nige biternesse is gemenged seo swetnes šisse worulde.
    With much bitterness is mingled the sweetness of this world.
--- GNU bash, version 5.2.37(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)