Hello Wilfred!

04 Nov 24 18:04, you wrote to Jay Harris:

 WV> I think it can be improved. I agree with the wording for the reply
 WV> direction. But for the original send direction it could be softened to
 WV> "should not" instead of "must *NEVER*". It's not normal operation but
 WV> I have done some tests where I wanted to sent from "PING", so it would
 WV> trigger another response when the PONG arrived, as a way to test my
 WV> own robot. With this wording it isn't necessary for the robot to check
 WV> for anything in the from field.

So if I read your comment you would like to accept a ping from ping but do not reply with ping as from

correct?


Dennis


--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240309