Hi Jay,
On 2024-11-04 11:57:50, you wrote to me:
Wv>> If I read that correctly... There is a use case to allow the from
Wv>> name in the received message to be "PING" !
JH> That line appears in the original here:
JH> https://github.com/huskyproject/hpt/blob/master/misc/pong.pl
JH> So I left it as it.
Ok...
JH> http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-5001.006 does say under 5.10. Robot flags:
JH> WARNING: the sender's name (in either direction) must *NEVER* be "PING".
JH> Should that line in FTS-5001 be removed or modified?
I think it can be improved. I agree with the wording for the reply direction. But for the original send direction it could be softened to "should not" instead of "must *NEVER*". It's not normal operation but I have done some tests where I wanted to sent from "PING", so it would trigger another response when the PONG arrived, as a way to test my own robot. With this wording it isn't necessary for the robot to check for anything in the from field.
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
|