On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 04:41:32 +0300, Michael Dukelsky -> Wilfred Van Velzen wrote:

 MD> It is more important to know whether 3:712/848 uses hpt.

I don't think there is any importance to the next-hop system in this case - as long as it doesn't strip seen+by's (which it doesn't). These are packets directly created by an hpt system, and unaltered by anyone else, also proven here using hpt.

  WV>> I've also confirmed the same thing happening on another system using
  WV>> hpt/lnx 1.9 2023-02-24.

 MD> I cannot promise I'll be able to address this issue any time soon, but to
 MD> do it I must have the hpt configuration from 3:712/848 and two messages:
 MD> the message he receives from 3:770/1 and the message he sends to you. My
 MD> email address is in the tagline.

I have attached two packets (zipped) for you via email that were created here by hpt. One packet was destined to a Z1 link, the other was destined to a Z2 link. This is before they even left my system, so obviously unaltered by another.

If you need anything else, please let me know.

Regards,
Nick

... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
--- Mozilla Thunderbird