| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | UUCP!!! |
To: Jeff Green JG>> The important part would be the "To: first [middle] last JG>> From:" part. BL> It would be better to use a separator before From: or the BL> program would be confused by triple names and hyphens. But in BL> any case it's only the To: we need. JG> I figured that whatever was after the To: and before the From: JG> would be the name regardless of how many separate words are JG> there. Quite right. I bow to your greater understanding. JG> Here's a copy of a message I'm going to send to the author. Let JG> me know if you think it needs changing: >> JG> Would it be possible to have Watergate put an "X-Comment-To:" JG> (followed by the persons name) header in messages gated from JG> Fido echoes to UUCP newsgroups? This is based on the To: line JG> in the message in the fido message base (Squish in my case). A JG> lot of the uucp users would like the X-Comment-To: header as a JG> way of quickly scanning for personal mail. We'll take care of JG> the "personal mail scanning" utilities making sense of the JG> header line if you could put it in please. I also copy this JG> header line as a kludge line to messages gated from UUCP to JG> Fido. Would it be possible to have these X-Comment-To: headers JG> used as the To: recipient on tossed messages? A lot of the Fido JG> users would like this if possible. >> That's good. It gets the message across ok. It's crazy that no one but us has found a need for it! Regards, Bob ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12 @EOT: ---* Origin: Precision Nonsense, Sydney (3:711/934.12) SEEN-BY: 711/934 712/610 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.