To: Bob Lawrence,

Replying to a message of Bob Lawrence to Jeff Green on 28/05/97:

 JG>> then Watergate will put Bob Lawrence in the To: line of the
 JG>> Squish message base. Without the (Bob Lawrence) part, it'll use
 JG>> Ubobl instead. Without the {at}To: kludge, it'll just use All. 

 BL>   That sounds ideal. I wonder why Watergate doesnl;t do it the other
 BL> way, and add the {at}To: line when it finds To: in the message base?

Who knows! It probably doesn't adhere to some obscure standard.

Regards...Jeff (jeff{at}matra.com.au)

--- WtrGate+ 0.92.p5-o gamma sn 500