| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Here ! |
On or about: 11-21-06 19:34, Jean Parrot did engage James Bradley regarding, but not limited to: Here ! JB> In case we don't hear from Jim, JP> Do you know Jim too ? Just by name. He tossed some info to an email account of mine once. JB> Give me a nudge, and I could look it up, if you wish. In short, the JB> two legs of output are identical. JP> I think not as I had a problem with one splitter, it would not JP> put out to the router, the Web signal. The second one did, that is JP> the original one that the cable company provided, I think that it JP> has to be just before the router, in the circuit. I forgot to notice, that no two outputs would be totally equal - seeing we *are* on Murphy turf - but they are designed to be. Your first device might have been faulty. It could also be, you *need* the isolation provided by the specialty splitter. Then it occurs to me, there may be a new design, that would select the frequencies to pass out of either output. The more head scratching I do, the more I favour this last approach. I think it was Raymond Yates, that used to work as an electronics engineer. I bumped into him in MEMORIES. Maybe you can point the question there, if you need to. ... James ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 --- Maximus 3.01* Origin: -=-= Calgary Organization CDN (403) 242-3221 (1:134/77) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 134/77 140/1 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.