| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Truss design thoughts. |
From: Guy Brandenburg
To: tkrajci{at}san.osd.mil
CC: atm{at}shore.net
Reply-To: Guy Brandenburg
Only one more test:
What are the results when you re-aluminize a mirror that has RTV residue
here and there? Or will acetone get rid of all of it, really and truly? Guy
B
tkrajci{at}san.osd.mil wrote:
>>From: Chuck Dethloff
>
>
>>One thing that I learned from my friends experience was that having three
>>mirror clips instead of only one (which I have traditionally done because
>>the other two seemed redundant) is what saved Howard's mirror from being
>>possibly broken. The OTA was laying flat on back upside down when I came
>>upon it. The mirror no longer supported in it's sling was rather now
>>supported by the upper bumper and tipped forward against the two mirror
>>retainer eye bolts attached to the lower two bumpers. Without that
>>redundancy his mirror would have undoubtedly fell forward in the box and
>>could have been scratched or possibly broken.
>
>
> Some folks are hard sold on the mirror clips and sling concept. When will
> they let go of the idea? When it's pried from their cold, dead
> fingers. ;-)
>
> My sixteen inch mirror is RTV glued to a six point support. No slings.
> No clips.
>
> In a manner of speaking it is held in place by six, adhesive, shock
> absorbing, high strength clips. In my opinion that is far better than
> three mechanical edge clips that let the mirror rattle about, and perhaps
> present a chipping risk during rough transport and handling.
>
> I don't care what orientation my mirror box takes during shipment. The
> mirror is bonded to the cell and won't fall out.
>
> When I first bonded the mirror to the cell, I tested it in stages. At
> first I did some gentle tilting of the cell, then more tipping. No
> problems. Then I inverted the cell. Again, no problems. Then I put some
> weight on the back of the mirror while the cell was inverted. Once again,
> no problems. Then I grabbed the cell as if I were an olympic athlete
> preparing for the 'hammer throw'...and whirled the cell/mirror about.
> Still yet again, no problems. (What other tests would folks like me to
> conduct?...short of damaging or destroying componenets)
>
> My telescope was shipped out to Tashkent...10,000 kilometers and three
> months. It survived intact, and when I assembled it for the first
> time...collimation was only a little bit off. Not too shabby.
>
> Can we please put the mirror clips and sling idea to rest?
>
> Tom Krajci
> Tashkent, Uzbekistan
>
>
>
>
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.