From: "Russell Jocoy" 
To: mikell{at}optonline.net, atm{at}shore.net
Reply-To: "Russell Jocoy" 


>From: Michael Lindner 
>Reply-To: Michael Lindner 
>To: atm{at}shore.net
>Subject: Re: FW: ATM re: Modulus of RTV
>Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:02:17 -0400
>
>
>On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:04 pm, mlbrown{at}everstrive.com wrote:
> > However, it is easily tested; apply a load and measure the deflection.
>
>..
>
>
>


>--
>Michael Lindner
>http://www.starastronomy.org
>http://home.att.net/~mikel http://www.atmsite.org
>http://home.attbi.com/~dcass/atmfaq/atm-faq.htm
>

("atm{at}shore.net")

  Michael,   Many don't consider the deviations of the secondary mirror or
movement, little as it may be
it is still there... Maybe too much thought is concentrated on the primary
movement and not enough on
the secondary. Yes the primary movement is "primary" but remember
you are looking through another
mirror too, small as it may be, it can change things in a big way..    Russ
J.
("atm{at}shore.net")

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5