| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM coatings |
To: atm{at}shore.net
From: tkrajci{at}san.osd.mil
Reply-To: tkrajci{at}san.osd.mil
> From: "John Sherman"
> >Enhanced coatings do reflect more light...but it's only about 5-10
> >percent more than aluminum coatings. Are you sure you can see a 5-10%
> >difference?
>
> Is it really as simple as that? What happens to that extra 5-10% if it is
> not reflected? Does some of it contribute to the background glow in my
> eyepiece?
See the links I recently posted - essays by Roland, such as coatings and
eyepieces and scatter.
> >
> >Try this simple test. Take a piece of clean window glass (no
> >anti-reflection coatings allowed)...look at a typical night sky scene
> >
> >Now look at the scene without the glass. See how much
> >better it is?
>
> Yup, easily. The sky is darker when looking through the glass, naked eyes
> (1/8" window glass). Stars aren't suffering as much, so it seems there is
> better contrast with the glass.
This raises a good point. The eye/human/subjective aspect of it all. If
you are into visual observing, then yes, subjective results can be very
important. I'm into counting photons with a CCD. I try as much as
possible to remove the subjective aspect in my work. If I were to put a
piece of glass in front of my CCD...I could objectively count/measure the
difference. If I analyzed star images with/without the glass...I could get
an appreciation for the change in scatter (and other abberations) the extra
glass introduces.
> >But what about *scattering* of light by the more complex/multi-layer
> >coatings? That may be more damaging to contrast...
>
> I think I saw an article in S&T a while back, where he was aiming the
scope
> at a black box in the daytime, and measuring how black the black was in a
> photograph. Is that the one?
It could be...it sounds right. Unfortunately I don't have easy access to a
decent library here in Tashkent. (One of these days I hope to visit
some...just to see how libraries work in a former-Communist-infant-nation.)
Tom Krajci
Tashkent, Uzbekistan
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.