| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM coatings |
From: "Tom Krajci" To: Reply-To: "Tom Krajci" From: "John Sherman" >...And if this is true, why do R&vV, in Table >19.3 of Telescope Optics, claim that 2.8% to 9.6% of the incident light is >reflected (much more at higher incidence) before entering the lens? I know >I've read in other sources that 4% reflectance is considered normal. The amount of reflection at a bare glass surface depends on the index of refraction of both mediums (in this case air and glass). Higher index glasses reflect more light. >There >is also a reflectance/scatter at the exit surface of the lens, and a >cemented achromat has three surfaces, etc. Yes, with more surfaces you get more loss from reflection and scatter. That's why I prefer simpler designs that uses fewer mirrors, and fewer eyepiece elements. If you need more surfaces, then you need to probably spend more effort or more $$ to reduce scatter/reflection on each surface. >So maybe enhanced coatings, if done properly, do indeed improve the view in >a reflector telescope, by providing less scatter. Or techniques to lay down a single aluminum coating that is very smooth at the microscopic level...such as ion assisted deposition. Depending on how much this process is used, it can get expensive. >>The amount of scattered light can be seen if you illuminate a >>mirror with a bright light, and note the amount of back reflection >>well away from the axis of the mirror. As you approach the axis, >>the amount of light scattered to your eye gets very large. >I tried this. It just happens that I have a 7" spheroid laying around with >a brand new Beral coating on it. So I put new batteries in my Maglite and >gave it a try in a dark room. And yes, there is a lot of scatter. Perhaps >there are some folks out there who have mirrors with a variety of coatings >who can do comparisons for us? We need to standardize and make objective this comparison. If not, we won't prove much. There are many variables to control here: quality of surface polish of the glass, age and cleanliness of the coating, etc., etc..... Tom Krajci Tashkent, Uzbekistan -+- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002 --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.