Hello Maurice,

On Tue Dec 12 2023 03:20 am UTC, you wrote:

 MK> If I got the previous reply correct - the split four lines of output from
 MK> /proc/version - then your template appears to be as retro as it can get
 MK> without breaking anything. I think you could easily lose most of the
 MK> kludges though but I am a tad biased when it comes to those damn things. 

The template used to be completely different. I was trying to adjust for my
liking, and it wasn't letting me (note the one message with the @-codes that I
messed up, because I didn't include a closing @ after the text). Then the next
message where those codes were, ended up blank. I needed some tweakery to the
Synchronet code for it to work, and Rob helped out with that.

Should be back in action now. As for the rest of the kludges, that's for others
to decide. I don't see them unless I want or need to. ;)
  
Regards,  
Nick                            

... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."