flags/flags>
 >> 
 >> This format requires secondary parsing (to split the string into
 >> separate
 >> flags), which in my opintion we should try to avoid, since we can use
 >> the XML parser for that instead.

 CC> How would you propose doing it then if not a concantenated string
 CC> seperated by a comma for multiple flag values?

Something like this:





  Jesper,
  yeppe{at}enjoy.cc
---