On 05/01/2020 11:08 a.m., Wilfred van Velzen : August Abolins wrote:

 AA>>>> gpg command line and output: C: \Program
 AA>>>> Files\gnupg\bin\gpg.exe gpg: Signature made 01/04/20 12:47:07
 AA>>>> Eastern Standard Time gpg: using RSA key 3BB37DA84A97932B
 AA>>>> gpg: BAD signature from "Wilfred van Velzen
 AA>>>> " [unknown]

 AA>> BTW, is it this one:

 AA>> keys.openpgp.org

 AA>>
https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/D50ECD4F514B75DC0A064F893BB3
 AA>> 7DA84A97932B

 WvV> Yes that looks like it. The ID that's quoted above is enough to
 WvV> search for it!

I found out that is not always the case. It seems to depend on the
server.  For example, I used your RSA key 3BB37DA84A97932B as above, but
the server at keys.openpgp.org reported that they do not support
abbreviated keys.

 WvV> wilfred@wilnux5: ~> gpg -- fingerprint - k 4A97932B pub
 WvV> 4096R/4A97932B 2017-10-25 [expires: 2023-01-01] Key
 WvV> fingerprint = D50E CD4F 514B 75DC 0A06 4F89 3BB3 7DA8 4A97 932B
 WvV> uid [ultimate] Wilfred van Velzen  uid
 WvV> [ultimate] Wilfred van Velzen  uid [ultimate]
 WvV> [jpeg image of size 5943] sub 4096R/2D3482F3 2017-10-25

What is interesting, I just fetched your updated keys from the *same*
server that I used on my lessor TB 2.0.0.24 pc, but this time on my TB
60 there was no photo offered or recorded.  :(

I wonder why the difference.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.9.1