| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM ARGH! A Scratch |
From: "Richard Schwartz" To: Reply-To: "Richard Schwartz" I would modify the procedure below in the obvious Richard way: Put a couple grains of 80, 120, 240, and 500 grit next to the scratch. Grind one half stroke at medium pressure with your tool, and see which grit your scratch matches. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas A Simmons" To: Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:45 AM Subject: re: ATM ARGH! A Scratch > > Scott, > > Put a couple of grains from the 120, 240 and 500 grit next > to the scratch and use your 10X magnifier. Which ones are larger > than your scratch? > > Unless you got a scratch from one of your tiles, I'll bet a > couple extra wets with your 500 will fix it. Now you know not > to let the wet dry out, and I'll bet you won't do it again ;-) > > Tom > Tucson, AZ > > Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:54:54 -0800 > From: "Scott Berfield" > Subject: ATM ARGH! A Scratch > > =20 > =20 > Sigh. I was pretty much done with 500 grit on my 12 1/2" -- and quite > pleased with how well it was going. As the mirror dried I saw a 1/2" > long scratch appear. It looked like a surface scuff but after anotehr > wet it showed its true nature - craters the size of elephants (well at > 10X anyway) in a line. I am not a good judge of sizes, but these look > larger than the 500 can easily get rid of. I know I need to drop back a > grit size and get rid of this horrible thing, but is there a good way to > estimate whether I need to go all the way back to 120, or if 240 > suffice?=20 > > - -sb > > > > --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.