TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: atm
to: ATM
from: optic{at}gwi.net
date: 2003-02-22 21:39:54
subject: RE: ATM recent lens designs/Iowa Scientific

From: "CSC" 
To: "Atm" 
Reply-To: "CSC" 


As I haven't built a refractor, my inquiry and thinking is purely prep work
for upcoming projects.  Regarding testing, I have setup some refractor
objectives (a 6" askania triplet notably) in autocollimation and used
Foucault methods.  I did not reduce these results other than to see that it
was well corrected for 3 general wavelengths.   Not Apo, but better than a
fraunhofer doublet by far.

>With some cut-n-paste, I was able to get this into OSLO.  A question:
At 565 nm, the P-V wavefront error at mid-field is better than lambda/40. 
Would you use this information to test the final result or would you find
the predicted result at another wavelength and test against that?

        Rick S.<

--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.