JS>> Yes, technically it would, but I was thinking along the lines of how
 JS>> one actually use them. Binkp, Telnet, VMP & Ifcico are direct
 JS>> "protocols" running over TCP. Transx is an other
"type", since it
 JS>> doesn't use connections but simply emails the packet to an email
 JS>> address... You don't use IP addresses with Transx. Make any sence?

 DR> Does it make any sense? Maybe. I could get picky about your
 DR> "definition" of what IP. The user sending that pkt via email has 
 DR> to use IP to send it. :-)

Yes of course, but a dialup Internet connection isn't listed as PSTN even
though it uses the modem and the phone line, and neither is a ADSL
connection even though it uses the PSTN wiring. ;-)

Email is email, no matter if it's sent via TCP/IP/Ethernet,
TCP/IPSEC/IP/PPP or any other network protocol (if you wanted I'm sure you
could even use IPX... ;-)

But maybe I'm caffeine poisoned or something. Do it any way you want and we
can take another look at it.

  Jesper,
  yeppe{at}enjoy.cc
---