| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Diffraction due to secondary sizing |
From: "Tom Krajci" To: Reply-To: "Tom Krajci" >From: "Kristopher Barrett" >These commercial OTAs are Schmidt-Cass., and have a corrector plate, >rAther than a simple window. They fix contrast problems caused by the big >secondary via a bigger focal length.... Diffraction effects (that spoil contrast) are caused by obstructions...like the secondary mirror. (I'm ignoring other effects, like bad figures, scatter off optical surfaces/coatings/etc.) Please explain how a corrector plate changes or overcomes these diffraction effects? (I don't think it does.) Also, how does focal length play a role in diffraction/obstruction-induced loss of contrast? (I don't think it plays a role.) I recommend folks check out this book: http://www.willbell.com/tm/tm5.htm It's not the only source of info, but it covers pretty well the concepts of diffraction from obstruction, and changes in 'contrast' (see the modulation transfer function graphs and associated discussions). Tom Krajci Tashkent, Uzbekistan -+- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.