| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM supporting thin mirrors |
From: "Tom Krajci" To: Reply-To: "Tom Krajci" From: "John Sherman" >Yes, but what I found is that the sticky friction problem is because of the >cell, not the sling. If you design away the possibility of friction/stiction/sliding in your entire cell/sling/support points/pivots/etc...you need never worry about it anywhere in the mirror/cell. That is one advantage of using compliant hinges, and bonding the mirror to the cell. Other advantages include: - no sling needed - no clips needed - no risk of mirror banging around on clips during rough handling/transport - cell bonded to mirror acts as convenient carrying handle. >...Teflon sliders >would be better, but the ones I have seen are soft and squishy -- don't >want that, your collimation would go all over the place. Those must be awfully soft Teflon sliders. Are they as soft as warm putty? Can you be more specific? Once we specify the softness of your particular Teflon, we can run the numbers versus a mirror size and determine how much collimation shift happens with changing mirror orientation. We can even determine what diameter/thickness of Teflon pads would be acceptable...depending on your design tolerances. Tom Krajci Tashkent, Uzbekistan -+- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.