| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | RE: ATM Large spider and secondary holder |
From: "Tom Krajci" To: Reply-To: "Tom Krajci" As scopes get larger, secondary mirrors get larger. Up to now, mechanical edge clips, supporting the secondary mirror, have worked well for the amateur. But as secondary mirrors get larger, and probably thinner to keep weight down...edge support of a large secondary mirror will distort the mirror too much and image quality will suffer. What then? Upside down 'flotation cell' design for large thin secondary mirrors...with RTV bonding to the secondary? What does PLOP say for edge supported mirrors?...at what size/thickness does image quality begin to degrade? (I know, secondary mirrors are elliptical, but PLOP would give us a first approximation.) Perhaps for big secondary mirror support systems...we may have no choice but to bond the mirror to the support? (The secondary hangs upside down...this seems inescapable to me.) How do the pro's do it with larger secondary mirrors? Thanks in advance, Tom Krajci Tashkent, Uzbekistan PS. Hmmmm, I can see some hard core lovers of slings advocating the use of slings in secondary mirror supports. Some ideas die hard. ;-) -+- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.